AI Now: Elon’s $1T Package, Apple’s $600B for Trump & How Small Startups Win w/ Dave, AWG & Blitzy
The podcast discusses significant AI investment, the success of startups, the trend of younger founders, and future technology trends. The podcast introduces Blitzy, a startup targeting large enterprises with legacy code bases, and discusses their approach to competing with larger tech companies through AI technology. The podcast discusses the challenges of applying AI to large enterprise codebases, the potential of Blitzy's technology, and the importance of co-founders in successful startups. The conversation focuses on the importance of reproducibility in AI model benchmarking, with a specific example of Blitzy's performance on Swebench, and the potential for significant improvements in software engineering through AI automation. Discussion on using AI to refactor large software codebases, the economic viability of such projects, and the shift in the nature of software truth from code
The discussion touches on the concept of a post-capitalist society and what remains scarce in an abundant society, with a focus on energy and intelligence.
“A year and a half later, we're finding ourselves in a world where it is entirely plausible that the true amount of capital invested in AI chips is much higher than people laughed at.”
Your call:
openUnknown: We will see more companies like Merkor setting new records in the future.
“how do you compete in that world? Right. If you're a young entrepreneur, um you're building a company and you're wondering are you going to get literally decimated in the wake of Google or OpenAI or XAI just, you know, happening to release a particular feature? Um how do you compete? Uh what's your mode?”
Your call:
openUnknown: Blitzy will significantly impact the manufacturing and insurance industries with its code generation and refactoring capabilities.
“They're, you know, manufacturing, you know, semiconductor manufacturing automation, you know, that's that's really deep. You get insurance actuarial risk adjustment. That's very deep.”
Your call:
openUnknown: Blitzy will continue to improve and achieve even higher scores on Swebench.
“We've come a really long way with the system and the primary reason that we were able to achieve this you know echoing some of the points that we made earlier is we're very different from the way existing tools are structured right so one thing is you can reproduce these results in production using pity right we've not added any custom scaffolding just for sweet bench we've not tampered with any of the features to achieve this we've seen reports from you know some of the other labs that claim that even though for example the latest frontier model claims 80% on stream if you actually run it and reproduce it, you get 60%. Right? And we wanted to not have that problem.”
Your call:
openSid: Blitzy or competitive tools will become reasonably economical to rewrite legacy codebases when generative AI cost reduces by an order of magnitude.
“At what point in your minds do you think using Blitzy or or maybe competitive tools does it become reasonably economical to basically rewrite all of the legacy code out there that civilization depends on?”
Your call:
openUnknown: Blitzy will serve the US government within 12 months.
“So what I just heard you say Sid, correct me if I'm wrong, is that the documentation writers, the spec writers are the new limiting factor for the speed of software development. Is that correct?”
Your call:
openUnknown: Foundation model companies may achieve AGI and dominate the market, but they don't want to be broken up by antitrust laws.